But if the "chibbin" of Gorbals Mick has been the most important political story of this - and many other weeks, the PM used today to bleat out what has to be one of the most pointless political pronouncements I've heard in ages. After a meeting with the Labour NEC, Gordon Brown revealed with great gravitas that MPs who had "broken the rules" on expenses would not be allowed to stand as parliamentary candidates for the party in future. Eh? Hasn't the argument all along been that the rules are so crap that no one - apart from the truly pathological thieves - actually needed to break them? If so, what's the point in talking about said tiny pathological minority? Why not say and do something of genuine value instead? For example, why not open up a debate on what might, and might not constitute enough wrongdoing to warrant de-selection? Or why not use the opportunity to recommend that each Constituency Labour Party carry out (with the support and help of the NEC) an investigation into the behaviour of each MP, de-selecting or re-selecting them as appropriate? No, I thought that would be too much like a properly functioning and accountable democratic process. It's quite shocking to see just how blind the Labour Party and PM are to what seems to most of us the clearest political reality of our lives.
* I'll believe it when I see it
No comments:
Post a Comment